FreedomwareThis is a featured page

Source: http://thenixedreport.wordpress.com/freedomware/ by Thomas

Freedomware

Sooner or later, I’m going to get asked this question. Ok, so maybe not, but just in case, I’ll explain it ahead of time. So why do I refer to Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) as freedomware instead? I mean, aren’t the various acronyms (FLOSS, FOSS) enough to be all encompassing? The reason I use the word itself is two-fold:
  1. Perceptions of the word “Free:” When I say, “Free Software.” what you do think of first? Liberty or monetary price? As much as admire Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation, I know that the words free software will often be seen as not costing any money, so there will be those who may be dismayed at the fact that “free software” is being sold. In addition, there’s always the misconception of the software being cheap, shoddy, or in some cases, communistic. The word freedom on the other hand implies liberty almost immediately. That is why I chose the word freedomware to describe software that is “free software.”
  2. Not all open source software can be deemed “free software” under the terms of the Free Software Foundation. There are instances in which the source code can’t be redistributed or in some cases, certain licenses can’t be used when licensing derivative works. Sometimes, the software adheres to all four freedoms but is not licensed under the GPL. Freedomware is a more encompassing form of terminology that includes all software that gives the users freedom to view and modify the source code and to share copies with their friends if they so desire.
It also solves the naming conventions of GNU and Linux. Both are freedomware as the user can have access to the source code, modify it, and make copies to their heart’s content. It sidesteps those who argue that it should be called GNU/Linux (and the opposition) by making one simple point: we’re on the same team here!

Side note from Ultumix the admin: Richard Stallman personally asked me to call it GNU/Linux so I don't think that this is a real problem. The Linux kernel is Linux and most of the software that is in the system is GNU and then there is the name of the distro (example Ultumix which is also a Trademark of USA Computer Tech Computer Rescue) so it would be Ultumix TM GNU/Linux.

Also from: http://thetuxproject.com/freedomware_defined

Freedomware?
land0's picture
Submitted by land0 on October 4, 2007 - 11:42am.
Freedomware is not intended as a term to replace Free Software or Open Source Software aka FOSS, FLOSS. These terms have their niche and place in society. They are well established and we are all better for it. The Free Software movement was not created to have mass market appeal it was created to address a serious issue. The right for mankind to use technology and to improve upon it given that the progress is shared freely. Free of charge yes as the very nature of its progress depends on it. But more important is that it is free as in freedom. Open Source Software on the other hand does have a mass market appeal and was created as a means to maximize the inclusion of various interests professional and otherwise. Both movements have borders that touch and crossover. They both tend to focus on the ability for software developers to legally modify the code that makes up an application. So in the end these separate movements make perfectly good sense to the market that they appeal to, developers. Now most of us know that FOSS applications are largely developed to scratch an itch. No matter what you refer to it as this ability to legally scratch out a software solution that satisfies an itch is nothing short of amazing. The best part is that some of the greatest minds in the computing realm are actively scratching and as a result made it easier for others to join in on the scratch fest. Inevitably the application grows and become easier to use due to it's incremental design. In fact most of them have become so easy to use that many people who are not developers are beginning to experience the freedom that these various software applications provide. This is a direct result of a the natural progression and inevitable outgrowth that software developed in this manner has. The fact that the software is free of cost often does not mean enough. After all you get what you pay for in all things right? Ok so we all know better but does Joe and Gina? Nope, they really don't! Meet Joe and Gina. They are small business owners who dream of being able to get their work done and not have to spend a bunch of their time dealing with shoddy software issues. It just so happens that their dreams are in fact a reality. There are some absolutely perfect software solutions for them that as it turns out are free and open source. Here is the problem the ability to modify the source code is completely lost on them. They are too busy managing and innovating their business. So how can I communicate to them the benefits and deeper meaning behind the freedom this software and its "priceless" nature provides? The significance it has to their business and the future of mankind is substantial. However they are not software developers so the existing paradigms completely fail to speak to them. In the past when explaining what FOSS is to other clients it is almost as though a huge gap opens up in front of us. All they end up hearing is the equivalent of wind whistling through a massive canyon. Freedomware! The first time I used the term Freedomware in the real world it got the attention of the client I was consulting with. They understood and related with the term immediately. They wanted to know more about it. I showed them the freedomware they could use for their business right away without a major OS shift(yet). I also found that I did not have to explain the deeper meaning. They seemed to understand what it meant in terms of freedom from over bearing and costly licenses. They had heard about Firefox already so I used that brand recognition and built on it. In the end I left them in much better shape than I found them in. It was immediate relief to some major issue they were having. The fact that I just saved them more than $600 was not lost on them either. They are now "clients for life." They are also willing to donate to the various projects that created these freedomware solutions. So in the end the term Freedomware resonates with a this new group. These people are experiencing freedom in relation to their computing experience for the first time. While they are not developers they are a very real and ever growing group of real people. Who until recently have been relatively overlooked in the FOSS realm. It turns out that Freedomware is to them what Free and Open Source Software may be to you. We are not reinventing the wheel nor are we asking that Freedomware be used in lieu of Free Software or Open Source Software. We are after all, just scratching an itch! While simultaneously filling the communications gap that exists between the developers and the rest of the world.

And From: http://www.softwareliberty.com/

Software Liberty refers to the freedom to control your own computing. Because it empowers the user to work, study and communicate, free software is important for anyone.
relevant

Free software is relevant

just as free speech is. Software is run everywhere in our society today, governing most of what we can read and do. Unless the user has some fundamental freedoms over it, she/he has no knowledge or authority over what is happening inside it.
source code

Free software is enabled

by the availability of source code, the "recipe" for the software. You should always be able to access and inspect this source code.
It does not matter if you do not have the knowledge or time to read and modify code: what matters is your freedom to do so, including the ability to have someone do it for you.
can be copied

Free software can be copied

at no cost. You may pay, however, for it to be written, adapted and updated – this is how free software companies generate revenue. You may always use free software for any purpose, including commercial; on the condition that it remains free if you redistribute it. You can think of it as "mathematics".
easy to use

Free software is easy to use

and technically often superior to proprietary (non-free) software. Some famous examples, often merely called "open-source"1 , include the Firefox browser and the Linux operating system.




ultumix
ultumix
Latest page update: made by ultumix , Aug 20 2008, 1:05 PM EDT (about this update About This Update ultumix Edited by ultumix

2 words added
1 word deleted

view changes

- complete history)
More Info: links to this page
There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)